Stoichiometry
Moles, gases, titrations, yield — AQA's “Amount of substance”
For the ideal gas equation, p must be in Pa, V in m³ (cm³ × 10⁻⁶) and T in K (°C + 273). Most exam errors here are unit conversions, not chemistry.
Every titration follows the same route: find n(known) from c×V, apply the mole ratio from the equation, then c(unknown) = n/V. Concordant titres agree within 0.10 cm³ — use their mean.
% atom economy = (M of desired product ÷ Σ M of all products) × 100 % yield = (actual moles ÷ theoretical moles) × 100Atom economy is about the reaction type (addition = 100%); yield is about practical losses. Examiners ask you to distinguish them.
3.1.2.4Full titration calculation — the 5-step routine
- Start with the moles of the known: n(HCl) = c × V = 0.0850 × 0.02140 = 1.819 × 10⁻³ mol.
- Write the equation: HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O, giving a 1 : 1 ratio.
- The ratio means n(NaOH) = 1.819 × 10⁻³ mol.
- Convert back: c = n ÷ V = 1.819 × 10⁻³ ÷ 0.0250 = 0.0728 mol dm⁻³.
- Quote 3 significant figures to match the data given.
3.1.2.3Using pV = nRT without unit disasters
Convert first, every time: kPa → Pa (×1000) · cm³ → m³ (×10⁻⁶) · dm³ → m³ (×10⁻³) · °C → K (+273). Do the conversions before touching the equation and the marks look after themselves.
- Rearrange for volume: V = nRT ÷ p = (0.100 × 8.31 × 298) ÷ 100 000 = 2.48 × 10⁻³ m³ = 2.48 dm³.
3.1.2.5Percentage uncertainty
% uncertainty = (uncertainty ÷ measured value) × 100. It doubles whenever a quantity is the difference of two readings — a burette titre, a ΔT, a mass by difference — because each reading brings its own uncertainty.
To reduce it, make the measured quantity bigger: a larger titre or a larger ΔT. More repeats will not do it — repeats reduce random error, not the % uncertainty of the instrument.
Deep dive📚 The rest of the chapter, in full
The ideal gas equation, without unit disasters
pV = nRT with R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ demands SI: pressure in Pa (kPa × 10³), volume in m³ (cm³ × 10⁻⁶, dm³ × 10⁻³), temperature in K (°C + 273). Most lost marks are unit conversions, not chemistry.
Formula-finding toolkit
Empirical formula: divide each element's mass (or %) by its Aᵣ, divide through by the smallest, then scale to whole numbers. For 40.0% C, 6.7% H and 53.3% O the ratio is 3.33 : 6.7 : 3.33, which gives CH₂O.
Molecular formula: divide Mᵣ (from the mass spectrum) by the empirical mass. Here 180 ÷ 30 = 6, so the molecular formula is C₆H₁₂O₆.
Water of crystallisation: heat to constant mass, then compare n(salt) : n(H₂O). If 2.46 g of hydrated MgSO₄ leaves 1.20 g anhydrous, n(MgSO₄) = 0.00997 and n(H₂O) = 1.26 ÷ 18 = 0.0700 — a ratio of 7, so the salt is MgSO₄·7H₂O.
Titration calculations — one template for all of them
The template never changes. First find n = cV/1000 for the known solution, then apply the mole ratio from the balanced equation, then convert back to the wanted quantity (c = 1000n/V, or m = nM). Write the three steps explicitly — error-carried-forward marks depend on visible working. For back-titrations: total acid added − acid titrated by the base = acid that reacted with the sample.
Yield vs atom economy — different questions
% yield = actual moles ÷ theoretical moles × 100. It is a statement about how well your experiment went — losses to side reactions, transfer and purification all drag it down.
% atom economy = Mᵣ of desired product ÷ Mᵣ of ALL products × 100. This is a property of the reaction itself, calculated from the equation: addition reactions are 100% atom-economical; substitutions and eliminations are not.
Green chemistry favours high atom economy — less waste, better use of feedstocks. Industry may accept a lower-yield route if its atom economy, energy cost, or catalyst recyclability is better.
Extended🎓 Beyond the standard course
Where the ideal gas model fails: pV = nRT assumes point molecules with no attractions. At high pressure, molecular volume matters (real V > ideal); at low temperature, attractions bite (real p < ideal). Gases are most ideal hot and dilute.
Combining uncertainties: for multiplied or divided quantities, add the percentage uncertainties. A titration's total = balance % + pipette % + burette %, and the dominant term tells you which instrument to upgrade.
Back-titration: react an insoluble sample (e.g. CaCO₃) with a measured excess of acid, then titrate the leftover acid. Sample moles = acid added − acid left. It is the standard move whenever the substance won't titrate directly.
- Acid added is 0.0500 mol and acid left is 0.0400 mol, so acid used = 0.0100 mol.
- From CaCO₃ + 2HCl → CaCl₂ + H₂O + CO₂, n(CaCO₃) = 0.0100 ÷ 2 = 0.00500 mol, so mass = 0.00500 × 100.1 = 0.500 g → 50.0% pure. Always sanity-check the answer: a calculated mass greater than the sample would mean a slip in the working (or impossible question data).
Mastery vault🏛 Every remaining spec point, banked
Avogadro's constant in anger
Gas volume reasoning (Avogadro's law)
Equal volumes of gases at the same T and p contain equal moles — so volume ratios ARE mole ratios. 20 cm³ of propane burns in 5 × 20 = 100 cm³ of oxygen (C₃H₈ + 5O₂ → 3CO₂ + 4H₂O). Eudiometry questions give you combustion volumes and ask for the formula: work the ratios backwards.
The back-titration, fully worked
n(HCl total) = 0.0500 × 0.500 = 0.0250 mol. n(NaOH) = 0.0400 × 0.200 = 0.00800 mol = n(HCl left over). n(HCl that reacted with the carbonate) = 0.0250 − 0.00800 = 0.0170 mol. CaCO₃ + 2HCl → CaCl₂ + H₂O + CO₂, so n(CaCO₃) = 0.0170 ÷ 2 = 0.00850 mol → m = 0.00850 × 100.1 = 0.851 g → purity = 85.1%. The template: total acid − titrated leftover = reacted acid → apply the ratio → mass → % of sample.
Uncertainty arithmetic
% uncertainty = (absolute uncertainty ÷ measured value) × 100. A burette titre carries ±0.10 cm³ because it is two readings — on 23.50 cm³ that is 0.43%.
When adding or subtracting quantities, add the ABSOLUTE uncertainties: a mass by difference doubles the balance's ±0.005 g. When multiplying or dividing, add the PERCENTAGE uncertainties, so the overall % uncertainty of a concentration = balance% + volumetric flask% + pipette% + burette%.
To reduce it, use bigger titres, bigger masses and more precise glassware. The absolute uncertainty is fixed by the instrument, so grow the denominator.
Making a standard solution — the six steps with reasons
Weigh by difference (eliminates residue error) → dissolve completely in a beaker (all solute enters solution) → transfer with rinsings (no moles left behind) → make up to the mark, bottom of meniscus at eye level (calibrated volume) → stopper and invert repeatedly (uniform concentration). Then c = 1000 × (m/Mᵣ)/V. A suitable primary standard (e.g. anhydrous Na₂CO₃) is pure, stable, non-hygroscopic and has a high Mᵣ to shrink weighing error.
Excess and percentage-purity patterns
Identify the limiting reagent by n ÷ coefficient, compute the product from the smaller value, then state the excess left over (n(excess) − ratio-scaled n(limiting)).
% purity = mass of pure substance (from titration or gas volume) ÷ mass of sample × 100 — the back-titration's usual finale.
Give the answer to the fewest s.f. in the data (usually 3). Keep guard digits until the end and never round intermediate titres.
Hydrates, dilutions and limiting reagents — the next layer
These problems reuse n = m/M and n = cV, but bury the trick in an extra step: a mass loss on heating, a series of dilutions, or a reagent that runs out first.
Water of crystallisation: water molecules built into a crystal lattice in a fixed ratio, written as the dot in a formula such as MgSO4·xH2O. Gentle heating drives it off, leaving the anhydrous salt.
Worked 1 — finding x in a hydrate. Heating 4.93 g of hydrated magnesium sulfate to constant mass leaves 2.41 g of anhydrous MgSO4 (M = 120.4). Find x.
n(MgSO4) = 2.41 / 120.4 = 0.0200 mol
Mass of water lost = 4.93 − 2.41 = 2.52 g, so n(H2O) = 2.52 / 18.0 = 0.140 mol
Ratio n(H2O) : n(MgSO4) = 0.140 : 0.0200 = 7 : 1, therefore x = 7 and the salt is MgSO4·7H2O.
"Constant mass" (reheat, cool, reweigh until steady) is the mark for all the water having gone. If x comes out as 5.8, you under-heated; if above the true value, you decomposed the salt itself.
Concentration units. Convert with M, and treat dilute aqueous solutions as 1.00 g cm−3:
| mol dm−3 → g dm−3 | × M |
| g dm−3 → mg dm−3 | × 1000 |
| mg dm−3 = ppm | (mass per 106 mass) |
Worked 2 — serial dilution to a ppm figure. A stock KMnO4 solution is 0.0200 mol dm−3 (M = 158.0). Pipette 10.0 cm3 into a 250 cm3 flask and make up. Using c1V1 = c2V2:
c2 = (0.0200 × 10.0) / 250 = 8.00×10−4 mol dm−3
In g dm−3: 8.00×10−4 × 158.0 = 0.126 g dm−3 = 126 mg dm−3 ≈ 126 ppm.
Worked 3 — limiting reagent, then yield vs atom economy. React 5.40 g Al (Ar 27.0) with 14.2 g Cl2 (M 71.0): 2Al + 3Cl2 → 2AlCl3.
n(Al) = 5.40/27.0 = 0.200 mol; n(Cl2) = 14.2/71.0 = 0.200 mol
0.200 mol Al would need 0.200 × 3/2 = 0.300 mol Cl2, but only 0.200 mol is present — Cl2 is limiting. Work from it:
n(AlCl3) = 0.200 × 2/3 = 0.1333 mol; mass = 0.1333 × 133.5 = 17.8 g (theoretical)
If 14.9 g is isolated, % yield = 14.9/17.8 × 100 = 83.7%. Yet with AlCl3 the sole product, atom economy = 100% — every reactant atom ends up in the product. The two numbers measure different things: atom economy is fixed by the equation; yield reflects losses, side-reactions and the excess Al left over.
Precipitation by ionic equation. For BaCl2(aq) + Na2SO4(aq) → BaSO4(s) + 2NaCl(aq), cancel the spectators Na+ and Cl− to leave Ba2+(aq) + SO42−(aq) → BaSO4(s). The 1:1 ratio means 0.0100 mol Ba2+ yields 0.0100 mol BaSO4 = 0.0100 × 233.4 = 2.33 g of precipitate.
This chapter has interactive quizzes, exam-style questions with AI marking, and live simulations in the ChemLab app.
Open ChemLab — free to start