A-level chemistry · Chapter 4

Energetics

Enthalpy changes, calorimetry, Hess's law, bond enthalpies

Standard enthalpy of combustion ΔH°c — enthalpy change when one mole of a substance burns completely in oxygen, all species in standard states, 100 kPa and a stated temperature (298 K).
Standard enthalpy of formation ΔH°f — enthalpy change when one mole of a compound forms from its elements, all in standard states.
q = m × c × ΔT   (cwater = 4.18 J g⁻¹ K⁻¹)  →  ΔH = −q / n

Hess's law

Bond enthalpies

See the energy profile simulation to connect Ea and ΔH visually.

3.1.4.4Hess cycles with combustion data

Worked example — ΔH°f of methane. ΔH°c: C(s) −394, H₂(g) −286, CH₄(g) −890 (kJ mol⁻¹).
  1. Route via combustion products: ΔH°f = Σ ΔH°c(elements) − ΔH°c(compound)
  2. = [−394 + 2(−286)] − (−890)
  3. = −966 + 890 = −76 kJ mol⁻¹

3.1.4.2Calorimetry checklist

Exam tip. Definitions of ΔH°c and ΔH°f must include "one mole", "standard states" and "100 kPa with a stated temperature". Write the equation your definition describes — e.g. for ΔH°f of ethanol: 2C(s) + 3H₂(g) + ½O₂(g) → C₂H₅OH(l). Fractions are fine; scaling to whole numbers is not (it must form ONE mole).

3.1.4.5Mean bond enthalpies (AQA-convention values, kJ mol⁻¹)

BondkJ mol⁻¹BondkJ mol⁻¹BondkJ mol⁻¹
C–H413C–C347C=C612
O–H464O=O498C=O (in CO₂)805
H–H436N≡N945C–Cl346
Worked example — combustion of methane by bond enthalpies. CH₄ + 2O₂ → CO₂ + 2H₂O
  1. Broken: 4 C–H + 2 O=O = 4(413) + 2(498) = 2648 kJ
  2. Made: 2 C=O + 4 O–H = 2(805) + 4(464) = 3466 kJ
  3. ΔH ≈ 2648 − 3466 = −818 kJ mol⁻¹ (data-book −890: mean values are averages over many compounds).

Extended🎓 Beyond the standard course

Deep dive📚 The rest of the chapter, in full

Definitions that must be word-perfect

Hess's law: the two cycle recipes

Using formation data: ΔrH = ΣΔfH(products) − ΣΔfH(reactants) — arrows go UP from elements to both sides. Using combustion data: ΔrH = ΣΔcH(reactants) − ΣΔcH(products) — arrows go DOWN to the combustion products. If you can only remember one thing: reverse an arrow, reverse its sign; multiply an equation, multiply its ΔH.

Worked example (formation route). For CH₄ + 2O₂ → CO₂ + 2H₂O(l): ΔrH = [−394 + 2(−286)] − [−74.8 + 0] = −966 + 74.8 = −891 kJ mol⁻¹ — matching the data-book combustion value, as it must.

Bond enthalpy calculations — and their built-in error

ΔrH ≈ Σ(bonds broken) − Σ(bonds made). Breaking is endothermic (+), making is exothermic (−). Values are mean bond enthalpies averaged over many compounds and defined for the gaseous state — two reasons answers differ from Hess-law values: real bonds in this molecule are not average bonds, and any liquid species adds vaporisation terms the calculation ignores.

Worked example. H₂ + Cl₂ → 2HCl. Break H–H (436) + Cl–Cl (243) = +679; make 2 × H–Cl (432) = −864; ΔrH ≈ −185 kJ mol⁻¹ (data-book: −184.6).

Calorimetry pitfalls (they examine these, not the formula)

Enthalpy level diagrams. Exothermic: products drawn below reactants, ΔH arrow pointing down, activation energy from reactants up to the peak. Endothermic: products above. Label ALL three features — the mark scheme checks each.

Mastery vault🏛 Every remaining spec point, banked

Bond enthalpy data bank (learn the ballpark, quote from the paper)

BondH–HC–HC–CC=CC≡CO–HO=OC=O (in CO₂)Cl–ClH–ClN≡N
kJ mol⁻¹436412347612837463496805243432945

Patterns worth knowing: N≡N's enormous value explains nitrogen's inertness (and why the Haber process needs a catalyst and heat); C=C is less than twice C–C, which is why addition across the π-bond is exothermic and alkenes are reactive.

Full combustion by bonds. CH₄ + 2O₂ → CO₂ + 2H₂O(g). Break: 4 C–H (1648) + 2 O=O (992) = +2640. Make: 2 C=O (1610) + 4 O–H (1852) = −3462. ΔH ≈ −822 kJ mol⁻¹. The data-book value (−891 for liquid water) differs because gaseous water is assumed and mean values were used — quote BOTH reasons when asked.

Flame calorimetry, end to end

Spirit-burner run. Burning 0.46 g of ethanol (Mᵣ 46) raises 100 g of water by 21.5 °C. q = 100 × 4.18 × 21.5 = 8987 J = 8.99 kJ. n = 0.010 mol → ΔcH ≈ −899 kJ mol⁻¹? No — −8.99 ÷ 0.010 = −899 kJ mol⁻¹ vs the true −1367: about 34% of the heat vanished into the surroundings, the copper, evaporation and incomplete combustion (sooty flame). List improvements: draught shield, lid, stirring, shorter flame-to-can distance, oxygen-rich flame.

Enthalpy of neutralisation experiments

Mix measured volumes of acid and alkali in a polystyrene cup, take the temperature rise, and use the TOTAL solution mass in q = mcΔT. Strong–strong pairs all give ≈ −57 kJ per mole of water — the reaction is just H⁺ + OH⁻ → H₂O. Weak acids give slightly less exothermic values because energy is spent dissociating the acid first — a favourite explain-the-difference question.

Hess with mixed data — the sign discipline

Where energetics meets life

Three-term answer template for "why does the calculated value differ from the data book": (1) mean bond enthalpies are averages over many compounds; (2) data apply to gaseous species — state changes are ignored; (3) experimental: heat losses / incomplete combustion. Deploy whichever two the context supports.
Test yourself on Energetics

This chapter has interactive quizzes, exam-style questions with AI marking, and live simulations in the ChemLab app.

Open ChemLab — free to start